Collecting primary research whilst on the trip to the Yorkshire sculpture park and the Hepworth was useful and valuable to an extent. I found that I only used these photographs within my sketchbook and to a limited number of pages, they did not influence my design process towards creating my final sculpture. However, using primary photos instead of secondary photos found from the Internet and books was considerably more helpful and get a stronger feel for the scale and materials that Caro works with within his sculptures.
Taking primary research from the gallery and sculpture park again was good to an extent. The images I have taken have been the best out of the research conducted, they are clear and show a wide variety of work that clearly display the different medians and scales that Caro experiments with. However, the drawings I have taken from the trip do the complete opposite. As they are a series of quick sketches they do not do the sculptures justice and in my opinion are very messy, even though they are meant to be to some extent. I did not take away any information about the sculptures from either places visited.
In my sketchbook, I feel my artist research has been my best work, in which I am very proud of. I feel that the research conducted has shown a very good understanding of the work each artist I have studied has produced. My favourites being Frank Stella and Peter Dahman.
For the artist research pages of Caro, I feel the work I have produced has shown a good understanding of the different styles of sculpture Caro builds, these being proved through the paper sculpture page, contrasting with the page based on his larger metal sculptures. I think the first collaged page also shows good understanding of the different ways Caro likes to express his work. I feel this goes for the Alexander Calder research pages too, showing his different sculptures through wire and a basic drawing of his larger scructal sculptures.
For Frank Stella I think my attempted replica of his work shows a good understanding of how his work is produced. Designing and painting the different shapes within this piece I feel shows that a basic understanding how his work is produced was gained. However, i do not think that the work went as well as I had planned and hoped it would and I think it has a childlike look towards it. This again goes for the Peter Dahman double spread, that I feel a very good understanding of how his work is designed and produced was gained. Attempting to duplicate his work and definitely given me an understanding of how hard the work is even though it seems very simple. I am most proud of these pages in my sketchbook and I am proud that I have accomplished my own paper sculpture.
At the beginning of this project I was very unorganised about which designs I wanted to choose to do. Originally I wanted to build a large scale sculpture that was mounted onto a table top. I found designing these by drawing very difficult therefore I cut out random arches to see if I could design a sculpture that way. Doing this I designed my first two designs. However after designing a few sculptures and attempting at making different maquettes for them, I changed my mind to a wall mounted, two dimensional relief. I did this because I felt my design was better once a small maquette was made, I also felt this would be easier and quicker to make within the workshops and initially fixing together at the end of the project.
In making my final design I feel I used very little skills within the printing and ceramics workshops as all I did was cut into different materials, I did not mould or sculpt anything within them. However I feel a lot of skills were used within the wood workshop as I have never used the equipment in there before and had not worked with wood in a long time. The machinery that I used within this workshop was not shown within the induction as they are the more dangerous machines to uses and require an instructor to be present while you use it. I did not make a Calder kinetic sculpture or use the workshops to design my maquette.
As my sculpture is quite a basic design there has been very little that has needed to be changed. In ceramics I had planned to mould one full arch for my sculpture, but as the clay can become very fragile once in the kiln, and my arch would have a weak point, my instructor, Deborah advised me to make two half arches and glue them together when fixing all the pieces of my sculpture together.
The wood workshop seamed the most difficult, as I wanted to make a lot of pieces from wood different things became difficult. For one, when making the arch i accidentally cut over the line and then sanded down too far creating a oddly shaped arch. This was very difficult to fix as I simply redrew a better shapes arch into the already cut wood and sanded down to that line instead. Another thing that was difficult was when making the grooves for my frame, the wood began catching on the fence and started splintering the wood. To fix this week placed a few layers of masking tape along the fence to stop it catching, then removing it at the end to sand down the small amounts that was left because of the tape.
I feel overall I have managed time quite well throughout this project. At the beginning I did leave things to do later which led me to rush during the first couple of weeks to catch up, but I did complete the work I had put off and to a good standard I feel. Compared to the previous project 'Hands On', I have not been rushing around at the end of the project and stressing to get everything completed before the deadline. Every major piece of work has been completed and it has only been a couple of things such as sticking a few annotions into my sketchbook and completing the end of this evaluation at the end of that has led me to run over the 1:00pm deadline.
Part B
When constructing my final piece I had a major problem of my ceramic arches not fitting into the frame because they had shrunk in the kiln. To solve this I was initially going to remove the ceramic arches from my final sculpture and replace it with a wooden arch, however after numerous people saying it looked intentional; I decided to cut the wooden arch so it mirrored the ceramics. So instead of two large arches at each end of the frame, I now have four, one in each corner.
After this problem was overcome, assembling my final piece was easy. Using a glue stick I stuck tissue paper and the cardboard building onto the backboard which was then stuck to the frame using pva glue. The wooden arches were also stuck to the back board using pva glue. The ceramic arches were stuck using a special glue which caused difficultly as I was not strong enough to pump the glue out of the tube. Therefore Adam, the 3D workshop instructor dos it for me.
Overall I am very happy with my final outcome as it turned out as I hoped it would even after the dilemma with the arches not fitting. If I had to change anything, I would change the material I used for the cardboard building as I feel it does look slightly boring, or I would have painted the cardboard before sticking it onto the back board.